Legacy Newsletter is now retired. For assistance please.

• Ap Statistics Exam Review Guide

Login to see your contact options. Legacy Newsletter Sunset Why did you retire Legacy Newsletter?

We created Legacy Newsletter to deliver on customer demand for a simple, straightforward e-newsletter tool to support user engagement and retention. Over time, the needs and expectations of our customers—and the market at large—have continued to grow. In response, we built Marketing Campaigns: an easy-to-use solution designed to help customers confidently achieve their email marketing goals. In order to best meet your email marketing needs, our focus will be dedicated to optimizing Marketing Campaigns moving forward.

Wiley CPAexcel Exam Review 2018 Study Guide: Business Environment and Concepts (Wiley CPA Exam Review Business Environment & Concepts) [Wiley] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

Without continued investment, Legacy Newsletter would have become obsolete and impractical for us to continue to support to the degree our customers deserve. How long will Legacy Newsletter be available? As of September 30, 2017, Legacy Newsletter has been deprecated. SendGrid recommends you. What will happen to my account when the product is retired?

Now that Legacy Newsletter has been sunset, you cannot create or send campaigns. This deprecation includes both the web interface at sendgrid.com/newsletter and at api.sendgrid.com/api/newsletter. Statistics related to email sent through Legacy Newsletter before deprecation will be included in your overall SendGrid stats, and are identifiable by the default category of Newsletter, along with any additional categories you’ve assigned your Legacy Newsletter campaigns.

Pricing Is the pricing for Marketing Campaigns the same as it is for Legacy Newsletter? Both Legacy Newsletter and Marketing Campaigns start with your base SendGrid plan (which can be shared with any mail you send using the API or SMTP relay). For instance, if you have the Pro 300K plan and send 100,000 emails through Legacy or Marketing Campaigns, you’ll have 200,000 emails remaining to send through the API or SMTP relay. From there, each email marketing solution charges a premium for sending through the user interface. With Legacy Newsletter it’s a $0.25 fee per 1,000 emails you send.

For Marketing Campaigns, it’s a $10 fee per 10,000 contacts you store. Your first 2,000 contacts in Marketing Campaigns are free. The option to choose your payment preference is no longer available. If you used Legacy Newsletter between 1 August 2016 and 30 March 2017, when you switched to Marketing Campaigns, you were able to choose how you’d like to pay. This has been sunset and is no longer available. How can I estimate what it will cost to use Marketing Campaigns? Leverage our to enter the volume of email you’ll be sending as well as the number of contacts you’ll store in Marketing Campaigns.

Why does Marketing Campaigns charge me for storing contacts? The default pricing for Marketing Campaigns is to charge for contacts stored in Marketing Campaigns as opposed to an additional fee for each email sent through Legacy Newsletter.

This is aligned with sending best practices by encouraging you to monitor how engaged your recipients are and modify your marketing strategy accordingly. Here’s how: Send less frequently to unengaged recipients: If you have recipients who are not opening your email, remove them from your list! Continually sending to these recipients not only leads to a poor recipient experience, but is also a poor use of your time and money.

By removing unengaged recipients, you save money, improve deliverability, and maintain a positive reputation with your recipients and your recipients’ inbox providers. Send more frequently to engaged recipients: If you have recipients who are highly engaged, test sending to them more often. With the Marketing Campaigns pricing model, you’re only paying for storing that individual contact, regardless of how often you send to them. Emails sent through either Legacy Newsletter or Marketing Campaigns count towards your base plan. The ability to segment your contacts into meaningful recipient groups is a core benefit of Marketing Campaigns (and a key enhancement over Legacy Newsletter).

Segmentation requires Marketing Campaigns to store your contacts, and that data storage is the expense that drives our pricing. What is the additional value of Marketing Campaigns vs. Legacy Newsletter? Send more targeted, relevant email to your recipients by leveraging data about your customers as well as how they’ve.

Gain visibility into contact details such as custom data (name, city, etc.), associated lists, last campaign engagement dates, and more with individual contact profiles that are dynamically updated. Marketing campaigns will show you which customers opened and/or clicked your email campaigns. You can also see which individual links in your campaigns were clicked most frequently.

Improved user experience: Ease of use is central to Marketing Campaigns. You’ll love the improved design and our UI/UX team has thoughtfully considered every workflow and is continuously working with customers to find opportunities to optimize. Marketing Campaigns accommodates your preferred workflow; there’s no forced step-by-step process. The end result is increased efficiency and a more pleasant experience. Allow your users to easily opt out of different types of content you send using Unsubscribe Groups, and rely on Marketing Campaigns to track that data so you can reliably honor recipient preferences. Better integration: Marketing Campaigns is fully integrated into SendGrid, allowing you to easily navigate to important tools such as Stats where you can see more complete data such as geography or device type.

Ongoing enhancements: SendGrid is investing heavily in Marketing Campaigns. Not only will existing functionality be optimized, we’ll continue to add new, valuable capabilities to the solution.: Marketing Campaigns includes several security and compliance improvements. For example, you’ll find the have been improved to make it easier for your recipients to unsubscribe from unwanted email, and have greatly improved our anti-spoofing protection. I’m using Marketing Campaigns, why am I still being billed for Legacy Newsletter? Your final Legacy Newsletter bill will be generated on the first calendar day of the month following the last month you send via Legacy Newsletter. If you use both Legacy Newsletter and Marketing Campaigns, you’ll see two distinct line items on your invoices.

For example, if you sent your final Legacy Newsletter campaign on June 15, and began using Marketing Campaigns at any point within June, you’ll see both items on your July invoice. Migrating Will SendGrid automatically migrate my account to Marketing Campaigns? We do not have any automated tools for migrating your Legacy Newsletter account to Marketing Campaigns. However, we’ve built a robust of resources to help make the manual steps to migrate your account fast and simple. And as always, if you run into any issues with the process, SendGrid’s world class support team is here to help!

You can also use the API to migrate your content, recipients, unsubscribes, and statistics from the Legacy Newsletter to Marketing Campaigns. For more information, see our.

What files or data can I download from Legacy Newsletter? For a limited time following the sunset of Legacy Newsletter, you will be able to download:.

Sender Addresses. Email Reports To save Sender Addresses:. From the application, navigate to Sender Addresses. Select Manage. Copy and paste the information you wish to save into a new file. To download Email Reports:.

Navigate to Marketing Email and then select Manage. Find the campaign you wish to save the data for and click the title. What do I need to prepare before migrating to Marketing Campaigns? First, review this. While your migration plan will depend on your unique scenario, the migration checklist will encourage you to consider the following:. Do you wish to migrate existing contact lists?.

Do you have invalid or unsubscribed emails you need to consider?. Are there key templates you wish to use in Marketing Campaigns, or are you starting fresh?. Are there images you have stored in Legacy Newsletter that you wish to use with Marketing Campaigns?. Are there campaign statistics you want to download for future reference or analysis?. Do you want to spend time testing campaign sends in Marketing Campaigns before you fully migrate?. Do you have API integrations you need to migrate? How do I move my contacts from Legacy Newsletter to Marketing Campaigns?

View our contact migration for step-by-step instructions. How do I move my templates from Legacy Newsletter to Marketing Campaigns? View our template migration for step-by-step instructions. How do I transfer my unsubscribes from Legacy Newsletter to Marketing Campaigns? View our for step-by-step instructions.

How do I download and save my historical stats? View our for step-by-step instructions to download your historical stats/data. How do I migrate my API integration with Legacy Newsletter to Marketing Campaigns? Please refer to our to see how the Legacy Newsletter API maps to the Marketing Campaigns API. For help with migrating your content, recipients, unsubscribes, and statistics from the Legacy Newsletter to Marketing Campaigns using the API, please refer to our. Contact Management What information will Marketing Campaigns store about my contacts?

Marketing Campaigns will store two types of data about your contacts: Custom Fields: Any information you share with us about your contacts such as age, geography, last purchase, etc. This data can be added using a CSV upload or using our. Currently, Marketing Campaigns can store up to 60 different. Email Engagement: Data about with emails you send using Marketing Campaigns. This includes whether they’ve opened or clicked specific campaigns as well as when they last opened or clicked any campaign you’ve sent. Will the Subscription Widget also be retired? The will no longer function once Legacy Newsletter is retired on 9/30/17.

As you migrate to Marketing Campaigns, you can leverage any of the following best-in-class email list growth integrations to manage your recipient signups:,. Segmentation What is segmentation? Segmentation is Marketing Campaigns’ powerful tool to help you send more relevant, personalized email marketing campaigns. With segmentation you can target specific portions of your audience who share common characteristics and craft content that’s highly relevant to them. You can segment based on customer data (like city or gender) as well as engagement with your email (such as opening within a certain timeframe, or clicking a link within a specific campaign). As an example, you could send a different email to “Chicago customers who opened campaign X” than “San Francisco customers who opened Campaign X.” Doing so helps you add more value to your recipients’ inboxes, helping you achieve your engagement and revenue goals along the way. Learn more about Segmentation with Marketing Campaigns within our.

How is a list different from a segment? Lists are simply static collections of Marketing Campaigns contacts. You can upload contacts either, manually, or via and Marketing Campaigns will store them as-is. You can also always choose to manually add or remove recipients from a particular list. Segments are dynamic collections of Marketing Campaigns contacts grouped together, or segmented, based on criteria you define. This can include data you track about them, such as gender, location, or package type, or how they’ve engaged with your emails previously.

You can create a segment that pulls from all of your Marketing Campaigns contacts or from a specific existing list you’ve created. Learn more about Lists and Segments within our. How do I create a segment? To create a segment, you’ll first need to upload your recipients (and associated recipient data) as contacts within Marketing Campaigns. You can upload contacts to your account either, manually, or via. Once your contacts are stored in Marketing Campaigns, you’ll leverage the user interface to define the conditions of your segment.

These can be either data about your recipients that you’ve included in your upload (such as name, gender, package type, etc.) or how they’ve engaged with your emails previously (such as last clicked date, opening a particular campaign, or both!). For step-by-step instructions on creating a segment, see our. Statistics What will happen to all of my historical stats in Legacy Newsletter? After September 30, 2017 you will be given a short grace perio.

Summary The numbers are nearly all in now. What they show about what really happened during the eight years that Barack Obama was president is sometimes different from what politicians claimed. The economy gained a net 11.6 million jobs. The unemployment rate dropped to below the historical norm.

Average weekly earnings for all workers were up 4.0 percent after inflation. The gain was 3.7 percent for just production and nonsupervisory employees. After-tax corporate profits also set records, as did stock prices. The S&P 500 index rose 166 percent. The number of people lacking health insurance dropped by 15 million. Premiums rose, but more slowly than before. The federal debt owed to the public rose 128 percent.

Deficits were rising as Obama departed. Home prices rose 20 percent.

But the home ownership rate hit the lowest point in half a century. Illegal immigration declined: The Border Patrol caught 35 percent fewer people trying to get into the U.S. Wind and solar power increased 369 percent. Coal production declined 38 percent. Carbon emissions from burning fossil fuel dropped 11 percent.

Production of handguns rose 192 percent, to a record level. The murder rate dropped to the lowest on record in 2014, then rose and finished at about the same rate as when Obama took office. Analysis Gathering statistics is a painstaking and time-consuming job.

Figures on crime, household incomes and poverty in 2016 weren’t released until September 2017, for example. But now we have a reasonably complete statistical picture of the Obama years, which began in the middle of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, and ended with the highest level of household income ever recorded. These facts often turn out to be at odds with the impressions created by candidates who, for example, claimed wages and incomes were stagnant when in fact they were rising. The facts also can conflict with impressions created by news media reporting dramatic but untypical events.

Despite nonstop coverage of several mass shootings, for example, the murder rate was going down for most of the Obama years, hitting the lowest ever recorded in 2014. Some of these figures remain subject to tweaks and revisions. Figures on handgun production in 2016 are still “preliminary,” for example, and others will remain subject to slight revisions for years to come, as statisticians routinely refine their methods and assumptions. We will keep this update current as necessary in the months and years to come. For now, it’s as “final” as possible. 14, 2018: We updated this article and its graphics to reflect that the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ annual “benchmarking” revisions added more than 150,000 jobs to its previously reported figure for January 2017, bringing the total added under Obama to more than 11.6 million (up from 11.5 million), an 8.7 percent increase (up from 8.6 percent).

We also updated a graphic in the “Immigration” section to reflect that the U.S. Border Patrol revised its figures on people caught while illegally trying to cross the U.S.-Mexico border upward by four for calendar year 2016.

Jobs and Unemployment Jobs — Over Obama’s eight years in office, the economy added a net total of more than 11.6 million jobs — a gain in total nonfarm employment of 8.7 percent,. That percentage gain is not as large as for most other administrations since the end of World War II. In fact, the only other post-war administrations to see smaller gains in employment were those of Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, who eked out a bare 1 percent gain, Dwight D. Eisenhower (7.1 percent in his eight years), and Bush’s father, George H.W.

Bush (2.5 percent during his four years). Jimmy Carter saw a much stronger employment gain — 12.8 percent — despite the fact that his administration lasted only four years, half as long as Obama’s.

Note: For these historical comparisons, we’ve begun with the inauguration of Harry Truman in 1949, when he became the first president elected after the end of World War II. For simplicity, we’ve combined the administrations of Democrats John F. Kennedy and his successor, Lyndon B. Johnson (who took office after Kennedy was assassinated), and of Republicans Richard Nixon and his successor, Gerald Ford (who served out the remainder of Nixon’s second term after Nixon resigned), as though each were single eight-year administrations. In our graphics, we show Republican administrations in red, Democratic administrations in blue. Obama had the unique disadvantage of taking office in the midst of the.

More than 4 million jobs were lost in his first year in office, on top of the 4 million lost in George W. Bush’s final year. To be sure, Bush’s eight years were, including one that began two months after he took office in 2001.

That helps explain why job creation on his watch was by far the worst of any post-war administration. Both Bush and Obama also were bucking strong demographic trends. The, which started in the 1960s, peaked at the end of the Clinton administration.

Also, “baby boomers” — those born in the years after WWII veterans returned from the war to take up family life — Labor Force Participation — Because of these and other factors, relatively fewer people said they wanted to work. Under Obama, the labor force — those either working or actively looking for a job — slipped from Job Openings — With relatively fewer people seeking employment, a job shortage changed to a under Obama. The Department of Labor reported that the number of nearly doubled during Obama’s time, hitting just under 6 million in July 2016.

That was at the time the highest in the more than 16 years that Labor Department statisticians had tracked this number. Before Obama’s tenure, the only time job openings topped 5 million was January 2001. During Obama’s second term, there were 25 months with over 5 million openings. It has since continued to rise, topping 6 million for the first time in April 2017, under President Donald Trump.

Unemployment — The was high when Obama took office — 7.8 percent — and it continued to get worse in his first year. It peaked at 10 percent in October 2009 and didn’t drop below 9 percent until two years after that. But slowly, and more or less steadily, the rate improved. By the time Obama left office, the jobless rate had dropped 3 full percentage points, an improvement exceeded only by the slightly bigger declines during the Clinton and Kennedy-Johnson administrations. By the time Obama left office, the jobless rate was down to 4.8 percent — well below the historical norm of 5.6 percent (the median rate for all the months since Truman’s inauguration in January 1949).

But getting down to that point was a long, slow grind. So slow that over all of Obama’s 96 months in office, the median jobless rate was 7.7 percent — the highest for any administration since the end of World War II. Obama’s experience is similar to that of Ronald Reagan — who presided over the second highest median jobless rate, 7.2 percent. In Reagan’s first term, unemployment peaked at 10.8 percent — higher than Obama’s 10 percent peak. And under Reagan, it stayed at or above 10 percent for 10 straight months starting in September 1982 — compared with Obama’s one-month high of 10 percent. Like Obama, Reagan also saw the rate decline steadily after the worst was over. By the time Reagan left office in January 1989, the rate was down to 5.4 percent, not far above Obama’s final month at 4.8 percent.

Both and left office with job approval ratings above 50 percent. Income and Poverty The inflation-adjusted incomes of American households reached the highest level ever recorded under Obama. The reached $59,039 in 2016.

That was $2,963 more in “real” (inflation-adjusted) dollars than in 2008, for an overall gain of 5.3 percent. The median figure represents the midpoint — half of all households earned more, half less. And while real median income hit a record level in Obama’s final year, it was a long, rough road to the top. In fact, the 5.3 percent gain under Obama barely made up for the 4.2 percent loss under his predecessor. And for his first six years in office, median income was below the level in 2008. Obama’s 5.3 percent gain was less than the 13.9 percent gain under Bill Clinton, and the 8.1 percent gain under Reagan.

It is also pushed up to a degree by, designed to correct for under-reporting of certain types of income in previous years. The trend to higher incomes also shows up in the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ monthly report on. That figure, which includes salaried managers and supervisors, was 4.0 percent higher in the month Obama left office than it was in the month he first entered the White House. It was 3.7 percent higher for just.

As incomes rose, the declined. The percentage of Americans living with income below the official poverty line went down to 12.7 percent of the population in 2016,. That decline also wasn’t nearly enough to reverse the 1.9 percentage point rise in poverty under George W. Bush, and it was far less than the 3.5 percentage point decline under Clinton.

And even though the rate of poverty went down under Obama, the number of people in poverty rose — just not as fast as the population in general. In 2016, just over 40.6 million Americans were still living below the poverty line, an increase of 787,000 people compared with 2008. Under George W.

Bush, the number went up by more than 8 million, after going down by more than 6 million under Clinton. Home Prices Home values rebounded under Obama, reaching a new high in his final year. Sales figures from the National Association of Realtors show the was $235,500 in 2016. That was $38,900 higher than in 2008, an increase of 19.8 percent under Obama.

The 2016 figure was a record, but only in raw dollars, without accounting for inflation. Prices reached their pre-recession high in 2006. In the decade between then and Obama’s final year, home prices rose 6.1 percent, while the Home Ownership The home ownership rate drifted down under Obama, touching the lowest point in more than half a century during his final year.

In the second quarter of 2016, 62.9 percent of households owned their own home, according to. That ties the lowest point since the Census Bureau began collecting the figures. The last time the rate was that low was in the third quarter of 1965. The home ownership rate began its slide after peaking at 69.2 percent in the second quarter of 2004.

It already had come down 1.7 percentage points before Obama took office, but it went down by a greater amount in his two terms as president. In Obama’s last quarter, the rate rebounded to 63.7 percent, as the economy improved and sales of and homes hit their best pace since before Obama entered office. But the ownership rate was still 3.8 percentage points lower than the quarter before he took office. Food Stamps The number of people receiving food aid under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly known as “food stamps”) rose by a third under Obama.

In Obama’s last month in office, there were just under receiving SNAP assistance, a gain of 10.7 million or just under 33.5 percent from. The number grew as the 2007-2009 recession threw millions out of work, as for several years by the stimulus legislation Obama signed in 2009.

The average benefit per person went up from around $113 per person in January 2009 to around $134 in July. At the peak of food stamp enrollment in December 2012, a total of 47.8 million were receiving aid, an increase of nearly 16 million or 49 percent. But then millions melted from the rolls as employment and incomes improved, and as Congress cut benefit levels, which dropped to a monthly average of around $124 per person in Obama’s final month. Measured from his first month to his last, benefit levels and enrollment both grew less under Obama than under his predecessor.

Under George W. Bush, the number of people getting food stamps grew by 14.7 million, or 85 percent (compared with the 10.7 million, 33 percent gain under Obama).

The average monthly benefit per person grew from $73.89 in the month Bush took office to $113.60 the month he left. That’s a 54 percent increase, compared with the 9 percent gain at the end of Obama’s time in office. Corporate Profits Corporations did much better than workers during Obama’s time. Their profits hit several new yearly highs during his tenure. Profits had surged under George W.

Bush as well, but when Obama took office they had plunged from their previous peak in 2006, due to the financial crisis and ensuing economic downturn. Then they recovered quickly under Obama — far more quickly than jobs or personal incomes — and reached a new record in 2010, his second year in office. From there they climbed even higher, setting more new annual records in 2012, 2013 and 2014, when they reached $1.74 trillion. Slipped a bit in 2015, but in Obama’s final year profits were still $1.69 trillion — not far below the 2014 record and 57.3 percent higher than in 2008, the year before he took office. That gain was higher than during all but three other post-war administrations, behind the 122.7 percent gain under George W. Bush, the 124.5 percent gain during the Nixon-Ford years and the 87.5 percent gain during the Kennedy-Johnson years. It was only slightly higher than the 57.0 percent gain during Truman’s final, four-year term.

Technical note: There are several ways to measure corporate profits. We present here the same, which gauges profits of U.S. Corporations from all their global operations, after taxes and without adjustments for inflation, inventory changes or changes in capital (such as depreciation.) Annual figures go back to 1929, and can be found on line 45 of BEA’s “National Income by Types of Income” table. Stock Prices Owners of corporate stocks also did quite well under Obama.

The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock average more than doubled — rising by 166 percent during his eight years in office. Among post-war administrations, that’s second only to the 209 percent rise in the S&P index during Clinton’s two terms, and it handily outpaced the 114 percent gain under Reagan. To some extent, the gain under Obama represents a rebound from an unusually depressed level.

The financial crisis of 2007-2009 caused stock prices to plunge. Bush’s last day in office, the S&P 500 stood 37 percent below where it had been on the last trading day before he first took office in 2001. Other stock market indexes tell similar stories. The rose 138 percent under Obama after falling 22 percent under his predecessor, for example. Some of the gain took place in the weeks just after Trump was elected, a that many attribute at least partly to investor optimism that the president-elect would, once in office, cut taxes and regulation as promised.

But the S&P rise between Election Day and Obama’s last day in office was just under 6 percent — a small fraction of the entire gain during Obama’s tenure. Stock prices already had set record after record before Trump’s election,. Debt and Deficits The federal debt more than doubled under Obama, and he left Trump a legacy of worsening deficits. Debt — On the day Obama left office, the U.S. Government’s was more than $14.4 trillion, an increase of more than 128 percent during his eight years. The debt also has grown dramatically even when, from 52.3 percent of gross domestic product at the end of fiscal year 2009 to 77.0 percent as of the end of fiscal year 2016 on Sept.

30, 2016, according to historical budget figures from the Office of Management and Budget. Deficits — Under Obama, annual federal deficits fell, but then turned up again. The deficit hit in fiscal year 2009. As, Obama inherited most of that deficit and signed spending measures that contributed as much as $203 billion to FY 2009’s red ink.

After that, the markedly for several years. In fiscal year 2015, the deficit was $438 billion, a drop of 69 percent from FY 2009. But deficits were again on the rise as Obama left office. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated in June 2017 that the deficit for FY 2017 — which ends Sept.

30 and is the last one for which Obama signed spending bills —. CBO also projects that under current law, annual deficits will again exceed $1 trillion in 2022 and beyond. As things stand, federal debt owed to the public will reach 80 percent of GDP in 2020, and more than 91 percent in 2027, CBO projects. Health Insurance Coverage — Millions of Americans gained health insurance coverage as a result of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The percentage of all U.S. Residents who lack coverage dropped sharply, from 14.7 percent the year before Obama entered the White House to 9.0 percent in his final year — the lowest on record.

Nevertheless, those gains fell far short of Obama’s 2007 campaign promise to “.” Our data come from the conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which has tracked health insurance coverage on a reasonably consistent basis since 1997. According to NHIS figures, 43.8 million Americans of all ages lacked health insurance in 2008, but in 2016 that number was down to 28.6 million — a drop of 15.2 million people. The number of uninsured actually rose during the first two years of Obama’s time, reaching 48.6 million in 2010. That’s because of the Great Recession of 2007-2009, when millions of workers lost their jobs, and any health insurance benefits that went with them. The number of uninsured drifted down after that, as the economy slowly recovered. But then it dropped sharply beginning in 2014, the first year that the ACA’s main provisions took effect. Those that individuals obtain coverage or pay a tax penalty, made government-paid Medicaid available more widely to millions of additional low-income people, and provided government subsidies to help those further up the income scale pay for private insurance.

Premiums — Obama also failed to deliver on his campaign promise to “.” For the typical worker, premiums continued to rise faster than wages or inflation, though more slowly than before. Premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance (which covers nearly, according to Census figures) rose 43 percent under Obama for family policies, and 37 percent for policies covering a single person. That information comes from and the Health Research & Education Trust, which is the nonprofit research arm of the American Hospital Association. To be sure, premiums rose twice as fast before Obama took office.

Family rates rose 97 percent and single-coverage rates rose 90 percent during George W. Bush’s eight years in office.

But the rise under Obama continued to outpace the of all employees (up 20 percent under Obama) and the rise in (up 15 percent). The effect on take-home pay for workers was made even larger because employers picked up a somewhat smaller share of the total cost of health coverage on average. Under Obama, the worker portion of annual health insurance premiums rose by $1,923 for a family policy, and $408 for single coverage. Both those figures represented a 57 percent increase during his eight years in office.

Obama when he first ran for the White House. “We’re going to work with your employers to lower your premiums by up to $2,500 per family, per year,” he said. At another point, he said, “We will start by reducing premiums by as much as $2,500 per family.” Aides said when Obama spoke of “lowering” or “reducing” premiums he really meant that he would reduce the rate of growth, though he did not make that clear when speaking to voters. Immigration The flow of people slowed markedly under Obama. In his final year, the U.S.

Border Patrol apprehended just under 443,000, down 35 percent from the year before he took office. Though it’s impossible to know how many illegal crossings went undetected, the number of those apprehended is the best available indicator of the overall trend. The percentage decline under Obama was far less than the 58 percent decline under George W. Bush, who nearly doubled the number of agents stationed at the Southwest border. Under funding levels established by Bush, from 9,147 agents in fiscal year 2001 to 17,408 in FY 2009 (which began Oct. Under Obama, that number continued to increase, hitting a peak of 18,611 in FY 2013. The number then declined to 17,026 in fiscal year 2016.

Meanwhile, the number of immigrants living in the U.S. Illegally actually fell, from an estimated, to an estimated, according to the Pew Research Center.

That’s a decline of roughly 700,000, or 6 percent. Similarly, the that the population of immigrants living in the U.S. Illegally dropped from 11,460,000 in 2008 to 11,045,000 in 2015, a decline of 415,000, or 3.6 percent. The CMS study attributed the decline to tighter airline security, increased enforcement at the border and improving economic conditions in Mexico. Such estimates are inexact; those breaking the law by being here can’t be expected to confess that to Census officials.

But demographers have applied from year to year, and agree that the trend has been downward. Energy Oil — U.S. Crude oil production, mainly due to advances in drilling technology, surged under Obama, helping to drive down fuel prices. In 2016, the than it did in 2008. As a result, U.S. Reliance on imported oil dropped by more than half.

In 2016, the U.S. Of the petroleum and refined products that it consumed, down from 57 percent in 2008. In 2015, it imported 24.1 percent, which was the. Wind & Solar — Wind and solar power has more than quadrupled under Obama.

Electricity generated by large-scale wind and solar power facilities increased by 369 percent during the Obama years. The increase in solar power in particular has been spectacular. Generated nearly 43 times more electricity from solar power in 2016 than in 2008.

Wind and solar accounted for 6.5 percent of total large-scale generation in 2016, up from a mere 1.4 percent in 2008. Wind and solar now account for as large a share as hydroelectric power, also at 6.5 percent of the total. These figures are. In 2014, (under 1 megawatt) “distributed” solar voltaic generation, such as the power produced by rooftop systems installed by homeowners.

In 2016, accounted for 6.9 percent of the combined total of utility-scale power and “distributed” solar power. Coal — As wind and solar rose, coal declined.

Obama put forth new restrictions that his administration called a “” and his critics dubbed a “.” In 2016, was 728 million metric tons, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That’s a decline of 38 percent since 2008. During the Obama years, electric utilities shifted away from burning coal, which accounted for 48 percent of their power generation in 2008, but only 30 percent in 2016.

The share supplied by burning natural gas went up from 21 percent to 34 percent, and the share supplied by nuclear plants remained steady at just under 20 percent. Carbon Emissions — Meanwhile, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere from U.S. Energy-related sources has declined during Obama’s time. Between 2008 and 2016, the amount of carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels went down 11 percent, according to. Emissions have been falling even as the economy has been growing, in part because utilities — driven by lower natural gas prices and government regulations — have been burning more natural gas and less coal. Emissions from electric power plants in 2016 were the lowest since 1988, according to. Trade Obama promised in his 2010 State of the Union address to “double our exports over the next five years.” That didn’t happen.

Instead, as the economies of major U.S. Trading partners struggled, so did U.S. During the full eight years of Obama’s presidency, (and actually declined in 2015 and 2016). Meanwhile imports grew even more slowly, by just 6.4 percent, and so the U.S. Trade deficit shrunk by nearly 29 percent. Guns Obama to reinstate the “assault weapon” ban that expired in 2004, but that didn’t happen either. As president, he also that.

Instead, annual U.S. Handgun production nearly tripled, as millions of Americans flocked to buy firearms. In 2016, production of pistols and revolvers totaled 5,314,511, according to by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. That’s an increase of 192 percent over the, and it broke the previous record set in 2013. The government doesn’t collect figures on sales of guns. But the National Shooting Sports Foundation — the gun industry’s trade group — tracks approximate sales figures by adjusting FBI statistics on background checks to remove those not related to actual sales, such as checks required for concealed-carry permits. Those NSSF-adjusted figures also set a record in Obama’s final year, topping 15.7 million.

That’s an increase of 75 percent above the 2008 level. These figures cover rifles and shotguns and previously owned weapons, as well as new handguns.

They are only an approximation of actual sales, since some of these checks cover purchases of multiple weapons, and of course some sales still occur without background checks. Crime Despite more than, crime declined substantially overall during the Obama years. The show the number of violent crimes in 2016 was 10.5 percent lower than the number in 2008, and the number of property crimes dropped 19 percent. Meanwhile the population increased by more than 6 percent, so the rate of crime dropped even more.

The number of violent crimes per 100,000 population was nearly 16 percent lower in 2016 than in 2008, and the property crime rate dropped nearly 24 percent. Among violent crimes the biggest drop was a nearly 30 percent reduction in robberies. But the murder rate dropped hardly at all — declining from 5.4 per 100,000 in 2008 to 5.3 in 2016. Earlier, in 2014, the murder rate had dropped to the lowest level on record — 4.4 per 100,000 — but it rose in Obama’s final two years in office. Car Mileage Obama set a goal of doubling the fuel efficiency of cars and light trucks, but that promise isn’t working out. Although he put in place a regulatory requirement that by model year 2025, car buyers had other ideas.

For light duty vehicles actually purchased, the average EPA city/highway sticker mileage has been for model years 2014, 2015 and 2016, according to the Transportation Research Institute of the University of Michigan. Model year 2017 isn’t looking any different. Vehicles sold during Obama’s final month in office also averaged 25.1 mpg — only 20 percent above where it was eight years earlier.

Meanwhile, the Obama mileage by the new administration. Guantanamo During Obama’s final 20 days in office another were released from the military detention camp for suspected terrorists in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and shipped to other countries. That brought the total number remaining to 41. When he first took office, Obama. But, and in the end Obama was able to accomplish an 83 percent reduction in the head count over eight years. War Deaths During Obama’s time in office, 2,035 U.S. Military personnel died as a result of the Afghan war and the fighting in and around Iraq, according to.

20, 2009, and Jan. 20, 2017, there were 1,751 U.S. Military fatalities, which and still has no end in sight. Also during Obama’s time, there were 284 fatalities He of Iraq at the end of 2011, but began after Islamic State fighters swooped in and captured large sections of the country.

Editor’s Note: In January, we plan to publish our first quarterly report on President Donald Trump. Update, May 17, 2018: We updated this story and its graphic to reflect that BLS’ 2018 annual benchmarking also resulted in revising the number of job openings downward by 181,000 for January 2017. That made the increase under Obama 97 percent, instead of the 103 percent increase originally reported.

Ap Statistics Exam Review Guide

Also, the revised BLS figures put the number of months when openings exceeded 5 million at 25 during Obama’s tenure, one month less than originally reported. BLS benchmarking also brought the increase in real average weekly earnings for all workers down to 4.0 percent under Obama, one-tenth of a percentage point less than originally reported.

Sources Bureau of Labor Statistics. “” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “.” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“.” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Census Bureau. “.” 12 Sep 2017.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. “” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. National Association of Realtors.

“.” 20 Sep 2017. Census Bureau. “” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. “” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) data,.

Bureau of Economic Analysis. “.” 3 Aug 2017. Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017., “500 and DJI Daily Historical,” proprietary data furnished upon request and used with permission under academic license.

“” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Office of Management and Budget. Congressional Budget Office. “ 29 Jun 2017.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Health Interview Survey. Kaiser Family Foundation.

“.” 19 Sep 2017. Border Patrol.

“ Fiscal Years 2000-2016. Accessed 25 Sep 2017.

Border Patrol. Accessed 25 Sep 2017. Border Patrol.

“.” 1 Oct 2016. Passel, Jeffrey et al. “.” Pew Research Center. Passel, Jeffrey et al.

“” Pew Research Center. 25 April 2017. Warren, Robert. “” Center for Migration Studies.

Energy Information Administration. “.” Short Term Energy Outlook. Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Energy Information Administration. “.” Monthly Energy Review. Energy Information Administration. Electric Power Monthly, “” 26 Sep 2017.

Energy Information Administration. “” Short Term Energy Outlook. Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. Energy Information Administration. “,” Monthly Energy Review.

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Affairs. “.” 6 Sep 2017. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. “.” 27 Jun 2017.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. “.” 8 Mar 2011. National Shooting Sports Foundation.

“NSSF-Adjusted NICS – Historical Monthly Chart” Proprietary data supplied on request. Federal Bureau of Investigation. “Crime in the United States 2016.”. Sivak, Michael and Brandon Schoettle. “.” University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. 5 Sep 2017, Accessed 25 Sep 2017.

New York Times. The Guantanamo Docket. “” 27 Sep 2017. “s.” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017. “.” Data extracted 27 Sep 2017.